The business case for client satisfaction and retention
The economics of client satisfaction and retention in the legal sector are compelling. As mentioned in the introduction, the cost of retaining a client is dwarfed by the cost of acquiring a new one. But that’s not the whole story — the same article reveals that just a 5% increase in client retention can lead to an overall profitability increase of up to 25%.
There are plenty of quick wins for law firms looking to improve client satisfaction and therefore retention, or so it seems. Brand perception experts ReputationX report that many firms aren’t even getting the basics right yet, citing a Law Technology survey that reported only 10% of customers getting to speak to a lawyer on their first contact, 40% having to wait 48-72 hours to hear back after filling out an online contact form, and 11% ending calls early due to frustration at not being put through to their named contact.
Failing to invest in the customer experience can have serious consequences for retention. The Birmingham Law Society reports that “following a badly handled call, 36% of people will take their business elsewhere, 34% will make a complaint and a quarter will leave a negative review”, and that, overall, 75% of people rate good client service as a major differentiator.
It’s clear then that many law firms need to realign their strategies, focusing not just on acquisition but also on the retention of their customer base by optimizing the experience in line with their clients’ expectations. The focus should be on creating a balance that not only attracts new business but also keeps loyal clients engaged and satisfied.
Aligning business practices with client expectations
Understanding and aligning with client expectations is crucial for successful retention. Clients seeking legal services are not only looking for expert legal advice but also value a personalized and collaborative relationship with their legal counsel.
While this might seem like common sense, in many firms lawyers and clients may have differing perceptions of the quality of the customer experience. The disparity between the two can be significant — as this extract from Clio’s Legal Trends Report makes clear: “Only 3% of legal professionals expect clients to want to tell them details of their matter in person, yet this is the preference for 70% of clients. Only 2% of legal professionals expect clients to want to make appointments over the phone, yet this is the preference for 59% of clients.”
To bridge this gap, lawyers need to prioritize effective two-way communication. Demonstrating a willingness to change and improve plays a pivotal role in enhancing client satisfaction — and encourages clients to return for future legal needs.